Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this 
to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will receive a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This procedure outlines the steps taken to archive a research item in the IASC repository. (2) The parent policy for this procedure is the Open Access Self-Archiving of Research Policy. (3) Staff and Faculty members who wish to upload their authored or co-authored research items to the IASC repository are responsible for ensuring, where necessary, that they comply with publishers’ policies on copyright and open-access archiving of items that have been published or accepted for publication in academic journals. (4) Staffand Faculty are responsible, where appropriate, for identifying student research work that is eligible for archiving and submitting this on the student’s behalf. (5) IASC administrators are responsible for conducting metadata reviews of submitted items and approving them for upload. They are also responsible for providing support and training for staff and faculty who wish to submit research items on IASC. (6) Users log into IASC using single sign-on (SSO). (7) Users complete a multi-page submission form in IASC, which involves the following steps: (8) In certain circumstances, per the parent policy, the IASC administration team may perform this procedure for items at the request of a Staff/Faculty member. (9) Student research items that are deemed eligible for archiving may be submitted, using this procedure, by Faculty in accordance with the criteria defined by the relevant academic programme. (10) The IASC administration team reviews the submission to check that all metadata is correct and all relevant information has been included. (11) Following the review, the administrator may take any of the following actions: Procedure for Open Access Self-Archiving of Research
Section 1 - INTRODUCTION
Purpose and Parent Policy
Responsibilities
Staff Responsibilities
Administrator Responsibilities
Section 2 - Procedure
Part A - Procedure for Self-archiving Research
Logging into IASC
Completing the Submission Form
Part B - Procedure for Reviewing a Submission
Reviewing a Submission
