Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will receive a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This procedure outlines the steps for ensuring that grading is consistently and correctly performed by moderating the grades awarded by Assessors under the Assessment, Grading and Certification Policy. (2) The Programme Director or nominee, in consultation with the relevant Assessors and Grade Moderators, is responsible for implementing the procedure for grade moderation. (3) Staff on the Programme Team who collect and store grades are responsible for selecting grades for moderation, in consultation with the Programme Director or nominee. (4) Experienced, competent Assessors are appointed as Grade Moderators. (5) The Grade Moderator for a particular set of grades should have had no prior involvement in making academic judgement for the relevant pieces of student effort for this cohort of students. (6) Following grading in line with the Grading Student Effort Procedure, the Programme Team takes a sample of the grades for moderation. (7) This sample group should include: (8) Grade moderation takes place in line with the Assessment, Grading and Certification Policy. (9) Grade Moderators review the application of the marking scheme/rubric against the student effort by the original Assessor to ensure consistent and fair assessment. (10) Grade Moderators submit a report (using the appropriate form) detailing any proposed adjustments to the grades selected for moderation along with detail of the extent to which they believe the grading scheme and criteria were correctly applied. (11) Variation in grading between the Assessors and the Grade Moderator may be discussed between the two in an attempt to reach agreement. (12) Variation in grading may be discussed between the Grade Moderator and the Programme Director or nominee to determine the final grade. (13) A module review meeting is held to review the moderation outcomes and process. In attendance are; the Grade Moderator, Programme Director or nominee, Academic Integrity and Assessments Manager or nominee and senior administrative staff on the programme. (14) The Programme Director has the final decision on moderation of a grade, subject to the Board of Examiners. Grade Moderation Procedure
Section 1 - INTRODUCTION
Purpose and Parent Policy
Responsibilities
Faculty Responsibilities
Staff Responsibilities
Section 2 - PROCEDURE
Part A - Procedure for Grade Moderation
Appointment of Grade Moderators
Sampling
Grade Moderation