Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will receive a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This (2) The Academic Board is ultimately responsible for the appointment and management of External Examiners. (3) The Programme Director is responsible for the day-to-day management of External Examiners. (4) The Registrar, as Chairperson of the Board of Examiners, is responsible for liaising with External Examiners at the Board of Examiners. (5) The Programme Director, in consultation with the Registrar and Faculty, nominates an External Examiner to the Academic Board. (6) The nomination of more than one External Examiner may be required where the programme expertise is so diverse that it is difficult to secure a single External Examiner with the expertise required or where the workload is so large that it would be unreasonable to be undertaken by an individual. (7) Hibernia College expects nominations for External Examiners appointments to satisfy the following: (8) The Academic Board considers the nomination with due regard to the competencies required. (9) If approved by the Academic Board, the External Examiner is deemed appointed. (10) The Registrar (or their nominee) ensures that notification of the appointment of an External Examiner and the CV of the External Examiner is forwarded to Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) and any other appropriate professional regulatory body. (11) The Registrar arranges for the contracting and remuneration of External Examiners. (12) The Department of the Registrar provides External Examiners with training and support to familiarise them with Hibernia College and the relevant programme. (13) The primary role of External Examiners is to verify that standards are upheld. Therefore, the reliability and validity of assessment procedures will be of particular importance. (14) Review the appropriateness of the minimum intended programme learning outcomes (i.e. the programme’s basic educational goals) and other programme objectives. (15) Probe the actual attainment of students (actual programme learning outcomes) using information supplied by the College. (16) Compare and contrast both the minimum intended programme learning outcomes and the actual attainment of students with the relevant awards standards with the National Framework of Qualifications (NFQ) and with corresponding data from other programmes in the same discipline in other higher education institutions in Ireland and beyond. (17) Determine whether the applied procedures for assessment are valid, reliable, fair and consistent. (18) Review the appropriateness of the programme assessment strategy and the assessment procedures and, arising from this, consider subsidiary module assessment strategies. (19) Review key assessment tasks prior to their assignment in light of the programme and module assessment strategies and students’ prerequisite (prior) learning. Where key tasks include key continuous assessment tasks, it might not be feasible to review them prior to assignment, but they should still be reviewed by the External Examiner. (20) Confirm the assessment standards in respect of professional practice. (21) Meet with individual students or observe students in the professional practice environment. (22) Report findings and recommendations to the provider. (23) Following grade moderation, a sample of all key assessments is submitted to the External Examiner for review. (24) The External Examiner determines if the students’ genuine attainment of the learning outcomes meets the standards required for the discipline, the award being sought and our regulations for assessment. (25) External Examiners are not required to re-mark individual scripts or assessments. However, they may make a recommendation for grade changes. (26) On return from the External Examiner, any necessary action is taken by the Programme Director or nominee, or referred to the Board of Examiners for consideration as appropriate.External Examining Procedure
Section 1 - External Examiner Introduction
Purpose and Parent
Responsibilities
Faculty Responsibilities
Staff Responsibilities
Section 2 - Procedure
Part A - Procedure for Appointment of External Examiners
Nomination of an External Examiner
Competencies Required of an External Examiner
Appointment of an External Examiner
Training and Support
Part B - Procedure for External Examining
Duties of External Examiners
External Examiner Review of Student Assessment Effort