(1) The following (2) It is the applicant’s responsibility to: (3) It is the student’s responsibility to: (4) The Garda vetting process is coordinated internally by the Admissions Office at Hibernia College in conjunction with Irish Vetting Services (IVS) and approved by the National Vetting Bureau (NVB). (5) All vetting subjects, including both applicants and students as appropriate, must receive clear communication. (6) The Admissions Team Lead or nominee is responsible for coordinating the activity of the Garda Vetting Committee. (7) The Garda Vetting Committee is responsible for conducting its activity in line with this procedure. (8) The Admissions Office will provide the vetting subject with: (9) For applicants, this will be included with the correspondence setting out the offer of a place (subject to compliance with the terms and conditions) on the programme. (10) The vetting subject must return the completed form by the date stated. (11) Failure to return the completed Garda Vetting form at this stage will result in a final reminder being issued and a revised deadline specified. (12) Failure to return the completed Garda Vetting form by the revised deadline will result in the offer of a place being rescinded, or suspension from the programme, as appropriate. (13) The Admissions Office screens all Garda Vetting invitation forms to confirm full and proper completion. This is referred to as NVB1. (See the ‘Accuracy of Garda Vetting Disclosure’ section.) (14) Where internal screening identifies inaccurate or incomplete Garda Vetting forms, the Admissions Office will return the form to the vetting subject with details of what is still required and a revised deadline for return of the completed form will be provided. (15) Failure to return the completed form by the revised deadline or failure to address the inaccuracies or incomplete parts of the form by the revised deadline will result in the offer of a place being rescinded, or suspension from the programme, as appropriate. (16) The College appoints Irish Vetting Services (IVS) to liaise on its behalf with the NVB. All correctly completed forms will be forwarded to IVS for part two of the vetting process to commence. This is referred to as NVB2. (17) IVS initiate NVB2 and vetting subjects complete this part online. (18) When a vetting subject is vetted by the National Vetting Bureau, their criminal record (if any) is disclosed to IVS as the College’s authorised liaison person. (19) Where vetting subjects have not completed NVB2 and IVS effort’s to contact them have been unsuccessful, IVS will refer these cases back to the College. (20) The College Admissions Office will issue a final notification to the vetting subject informing them that their offer of a place will be rescinded, or that they will be suspended, if they do not complete their NVB2. (21) Failure to complete NVB2 within one week of notification by the College will result in the offer of a place being rescinded automatically, or suspension, as appropriate. (22) Once the NVB return the information, the Admissions Team Lead will review and evaluate the information. (23) The Admissions Team Lead will then classify the disclosure under the following headings and take the appropriate action: (24) Where a disclosure returns anything other than a NIL outcome, the IVS liaison person will return this information to the College as a matter of priority. (25) Applicants who have satisfactorily completed Garda Vetting (and any other requirements of the registration process) will be deemed to have completed registration. (26) Where there are no previous convictions recorded by the National Vetting Bureau, the Garda Vetting process is complete and the vetting subject is identified as cleared. (27) The vetting subject will be issued with a copy of their disclosure and an accompanying letter for the purpose of work placements to confirm their suitability to participate on the programme and to confirm for any work placement provider that the vetting process is complete. (28) The Admissions Team Lead may classify a case pending/convictions as minor if it is not considered to have involved a serious breach of trust or does not by its nature give rise to specific concerns in relation to contact with children, young people or other vulnerable groups, for example, very minor motoring offences (e.g. minimal penalty points, failure to display a tax disc), very minor public offences and other minor offences will not be included. (29) In cases of multiple minor convictions/pending cases, or where there is evidence of repeat offending or recidivism, the Admissions Team Lead reserves the right to refer the case(s) to the Garda Vetting Committee. (See the ‘Garda Vetting Committee’ section.) (30) The Admissions Team Lead may classify a conviction as serious if the conviction(s) is considered to have involved a serious breach of trust or by their nature give rise to specific concerns in relation to contact with children, young people or other vulnerable groups. (31) The Admissions Team Lead will refer any offences classified as serious to the Garda Vetting Committee for a decision on whether or not the student should be permitted to continue on the programme in light of the disclosures. (32) Where there are cases pending or cases yet to be assigned, as featured on the disclosure, which the admissions team have not classified as minor, the applicant will be required to postpone their place/the student’s place on the programme will be suspended until such a time as all outstanding cases have been concluded in full. (33) In cases where the cooling-off period has not concluded, the vetting subject can opt out of the programme and obtain a refund of fees paid, less the specified administration fee. Alternatively, if they do not seek to obtain a refund, their place will be postponed to a future intake. As per the Admission Offers Procedure, commencement of the programme can be postponed for up to one year only. If the matter has not been concluded in full, within one year from the date of the postponement thee student will be required to opt out of the programme and obtain a refund of fees paid, less the specified administration fee. (34) In cases where the cooling-off period has concluded, the student’s registration will be suspended until such a time as all outstanding cases have been concluded in full. (35) Once the case has concluded, the vetting subject will need to initiate another Garda Vetting application through the College so that the College can review the disclosure and any outcomes pertaining to these cases or any cases which may arise in the interim. (36) Any convictions which are disclosed will be dealt with in accordance with the terms of this procedure. (37) Students who have completed the Garda Vetting process and have been deemed suitable for a place on the programme concerned will be provided with a copy of their vetting disclosure and a letter outlining this, which can be given to placement providers as confirmation. (38) Placement providers will also be asked to sign a Joint Sharing of Vetting Agreement. By signing this, Hibernia College will share the Garda Vetting with the placement provider and do not need to carry out the Garda Vetting independently. (39) Where a placement provider does not wish to sign this document, they must carry out Garda Vetting of their own. (40) The timeframe within the NVB returns completed Garda Vetting forms is outside of the control of the College. (41) In the event of the NVB failing to return a completed Garda Vetting for a student before commencement of the placement practice element of their programme, the student will not be authorised to undertake a professional placement including observation. (42) In the event of a professional practice placement being delayed, this can have implications for the student’s wider programme of study. (43) As far as is practicable, the College will attempt to retain the student with their existing intake but, in some cases, the College will be required to transfer them to a future intake and, thus, extend the end date of their programme where other arrangements cannot be facilitated. (44) Students should be aware, that given the duration of degree programmes, the College reserves the right, at its discretion, to require certain groups of students to undergo a further Garda Vetting process during the course of their degree programme. (45) In the event of any change in the vetting subject’s status regarding criminal convictions or Garda Vetting, the vetting subject is required to immediately communicate the details of the change to the College Registrar. (46) Failure to comply with this requirement will be considered a very serious matter and may result in the student’s withdrawal from the programme. (47) Where the details within the vetting disclosure are disputed, the vetting subject will outline, in writing, the exact basis for their dispute to the Admissions Team Lead, who will ensure the report is sent to the NVB for further checks. (48) In the event of a vetting subject disputing the details within the vetting disclosure provided by the NVB, during their initial vetting process, their place remains conditional until the NVB advises on the accuracy of the vetting disclosure. (49) Where the NVB confirms the accuracy of the vetting disclosure, the vetting subject will be advised and no further engagement on this outcome will be undertaken. (50) Where the NVB confirms inaccuracies in the vetting disclosure, the appropriate action will be taken based on the revised findings. (51) The vetting subject is advised of the vetting outcome and advised that the disclosure will be referred to the Garda Vetting Committee. (52) The vetting subject is provided with a copy and asked to confirm the accuracy of the disclosure. (53) The Garda Vetting Committee will assess the information and call the vetting subject to a meeting where it believes the vetting subject’s attendance will assist the decision-making process. (54) Any vetting subject invited to attend a meeting of the Garda Vetting Committee does so to assist the decision-making process. (55) If an invited vetting subject chooses not to attend, the meeting will proceed in absentia. (56) Any vetting subject who is not invited to attend a meeting will be invited to make a written submission to the Garda Vetting Committee. (57) At the meeting, the vetting subject will be asked to discuss the circumstances of the offence/conviction. (58) Garda Vetting Committee meetings are not intended to be adversarial. (59) A vetting subject may opt to be accompanied by a friend or family member in a supportive capacity. However, where this person is a member of the legal profession, they cannot act in that capacity. (60) Any person accompanying a vetting subject in a supportive capacity is in attendance as an observer. (61) The Garda Vetting Committee is responsible for considering cases where criminal convictions are returned on the Garda Vetting disclosure and making a decision on the suitability of the vetting subject for the programme. (62) A decision in relation to the vetting subject’s place on a programme will then be made by the Garda Vetting Committee, based on the information provided. (63) The Garda Vetting Committee may consider a number of factors in making its decision including, but not limited to, the following: (64) The Garda Vetting Committee will take particular note of offences or disciplinary issues of a sexual, violent, dishonest or drug-related nature. (65) Furthermore, the Garda Vetting Committee may decide to withdraw the vetting subject from the programme/revoke the offer of a place with immediate effect unless it is satisfied that there is evidence that the vetting subject has changed their behaviour and evidence that they are trustworthy and do not pose a risk to the public. (66) Where a meeting has taken place: (67) Where applicable, the Admissions Team Lead or nominee will issue a letter to the vetting subject outlining that whilst their registration is confirmed, should any issues arise for work placements or subsequent employment that this is the sole responsibility of the vetting subject. (68) The vetting subject may, within 5 working days of communication of the decision, appeal the decision in accordance with the Appeals Policy. (69) The vetting subject will not be permitted to continue on the programme pending the outcome of the Appeal.Garda Vetting Procedure
Section 1 - Introduction
The parent policy is the Admissions Policy with particular reference to the ‘Garda Vetting’ section. Responsibilities
Student Responsibilities
Staff Responsibilities
The College Garda Vetting Committee
Section 2 - Procedure
Part A - Procedure for Applying for Garda Vetting
Garda Vetting Application
Internal Screening (NVB1)
External Screening (NVB2)
Vetting Outcome and Evaluation
Part B - College Decisions and Actions on Outcomes Arising from Garda Vetting
NIL Outcome
Cases Pending/Convictions (Minor Offences)
Convictions (Serious Offences)
Cases Pending (Serious Offences)
Implications for Professional Placements
Failure of NVB to Return Completed Garda Vetting
Part C - Ongoing Implications of Garda Vetting
Further Garda Vetting Processes
Failure to Comply
Part D - Accuracy of Garda Vetting Disclosure
Disputing Accuracy
Part E - The Garda Vetting Committee
Vetting Subject Notification
Vetting Subject Attendance at Meetings of the Garda Vetting Committee
Decision of the Garda Vetting Committee
Record of Meetings of the Garda Vetting Committee and Communication of Outcomes
Right of Appeal
View Current
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.